Sen. Clinton's worst idea yet
As Tully mentioned briefly in the weekend round-up, Sen. Hillary Clinton has proposed a "national service academy" to train public servants for government work:
"I'm going to be asking a new generation to serve," she said. "I think just like our military academies, we need to give a totally all-paid education to young men and women who will serve their country in a public service position."
As someone who has spent most of my professional career working for the government, I think that public service can be a noble and rewarding profession, often understandably (if regrettably) maligned by our ultimate bosses, the people. Getting things done in government is not easy, and angering the wrong people (even when promoting great ideas) can quickly cut short your professional advancement or send you packing out the door. Most of us deserve more respect than we get.
Military academies make sense because the military is a very special, unusual sort of job. Ordinary university training does not prepare one to lead men (and increasingly women) into battle. It does not teach one how to mold excitable, hyperactive, undisciplined teenagers into clear-thinking professionals capable of operating $100 million pieces of equipment, with thousands of lives at stake.
Civilian public service, worthy as it is, however, requires no such specialized training. The rules are occasionally different than in the private sector (a LOT more record keeping, for example), but the jobs for the government, outside of law enforcement and the foreign service, are pretty much the same as in the private sector.
The public is already separated enough from government. Much of the highest bureaucracies of federal government are dominated by people like Sen. Clinton, graduates of Yale and Harvard, tightly connected to a relatively small group of like-minded people who bounce back and forth between the public and private sectors.
Why does Sen. Clinton wish to adopt a French program, Ecole Nationale d'Administration, which is under fire even in France? As long ago as 1995, Jacques Chirac warned of the dangers of a "dictatorship of a technocratic élite," the civil servants produced by a single school dedicated to producing "right-thinking" civil servants.
In a career of profoundly bad, leftist ideas, this just may be her worst ever. On a practical level, does she think that John Kerry's campaign was helped by his love affair with all things French?
No comments:
Post a Comment